|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
474
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
This reminds me of the second amendment for the US. Group A (high sec) wants to see guns removed from the public eye, but to ask them to dirty their hands and do it themselves is just a ludicrous idea. As we can see they turn the government (CCP) to do the work for them even though they are saying "hey, it's their right". Now on to the point I'm trying to make. Banded alliances will get as much support from high sec'r's as denizens of high sec have gotten in attempting to band high together to do it themselves. As in none. Yeah, high sec will say "that's a great idea" followed up by "you go do that" before they go back to their daily routine of mining, missioning, trading, or whatever else it is that high sec does. Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
474
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Makkal Hanaya wrote:THE L0CK wrote: Group A (high sec) wants to see guns removed from the public eye, but to ask them to dirty their hands and do it themselves is just a ludicrous idea. Do you really think all of high sec wants to see guns removed from the public eye?
Did I say all of high sec? I'm high sec and I've got guns that I use on bears from time to time. Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
474
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:THE L0CK wrote:This reminds me of the second amendment for the US. Group A (high sec) wants to see guns removed from the public eye, but to ask them to dirty their hands and do it themselves is just a ludicrous idea. As we can see they turn the government (CCP) to do the work for them even though they are saying "hey, it's their right". Now on to the point I'm trying to make. Banded alliances will get as much support from high sec'r's as denizens of high sec have gotten in attempting to band high together to do it themselves. As in none. Yeah, high sec will say "that's a great idea" followed up by "you go do that" before they go back to their daily routine of mining, missioning, trading, or whatever else it is that high sec does. There is a big difference between bullying and removing PVP in high sec. You are one of those liberals who would argue an apple is a banna aslong as it's in the rules..
I'm not a liberal. I have no idea what a banna is. Haven't you quit yet? Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
474
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 20:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Makkal Hanaya wrote:THE L0CK wrote:Makkal Hanaya wrote:THE L0CK wrote: Group A (high sec) wants to see guns removed from the public eye, but to ask them to dirty their hands and do it themselves is just a ludicrous idea. Do you really think all of high sec wants to see guns removed from the public eye? Did I say all of high sec? I'm high sec and I've got guns that I use on bears from time to time. No, but your wording implied all, or at least a strong majority, might feel this way. Hence my asking.
My wording consist of High sec asking ccp to intervene on GSF actions in high sec, I gave no implications to group size. I likened it to the real world event as that it what it reminds me of (note personal opinion), also giving no number size.
Your mind subconsciously placed a number size into the statement. Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
|
|
|